Re: Opinions???

[Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Didier> Didier PH Martin <URL:mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

0> In article <NBBBJPGDLPIHJGEHAKBAIEAEDGAA.martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
0> Didier wrote:

Didier> Does anybody read this:
Didier> <URL:http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/05/xsl/xslconsidered_5.html>

Well, I tried, but it is possibly the most malformed HTML I have ever
come across, so I resorted to reading the bare HTML :-(


Didier> What is your opinion?

I agree that XSL is no simpler for authors than DSSSL - but not with
the initial premise that DSSSL itself is too hard to be useful.  Most
DSSSL projects start with a basic transformation, then add the bells
and whistles onto the initial working program, so the complexity of a
"finished" stylesheet is probably not a good indicator.  I'll keep
using DSSSL for a long time to come.

-- 


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist