RE: The DSSSList Digest V3 #50

Subject: RE: The DSSSList Digest V3 #50
From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 22:31:44 +0100 (BST)
Wroth, Mark writes:
 > implementation).  Perhaps an approach might be to have a TeX backend which
 > emits macros which then require individual definition?  I'd find that

but thats what Jade is doing now. can you give a concrete example
of what you would change?

 > Finally, I'd like to thank James for both his thoughtful (and
 > thought-provoking) reply, and for a very useful tool as it stands.

and even if Jade gradually fades out, I think many people may agree
with me that its very existence over the last few years has been an
inspiration to think `properly' about processing SGML/XML


 DSSSList info and archive:

Current Thread