RE: The DSSSList Digest V3 #50

Subject: RE: The DSSSList Digest V3 #50
From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 09:25:02 +0100
 Mark wrote:

the proposal to implement a 
>not-so-simple-page-sequence makes a
>lot of sense to me. TeX in particular is capable of *much* more than

How to define the 'in-between' level?

1. Come down from the spec definition to what can be achieved.
2. Find out what people want, and only go that far up from
3. Go as far as TeX can go.

Would suggest a merge of 2 and 3, with 2 taking priority.
Rationale? Meeting customer demand rather than technical capability.

We have had lots of 'I wish' statements on the list.
could we collect those which are

Highly desirable,
Nice to have

Then look at the feasibility of implementation, majoring on the former?

My starter for ten is a multi-line header / footer.

regards, DaveP

 DSSSList info and archive:

Current Thread