Re: SGML entity mgmt stds

Subject: Re: SGML entity mgmt stds
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Jun 1999 13:56:45 -0400
"Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> so the following hierarchy is OK for me:
> SGML
>  |__ DTD
>  |__ entity
>  |__ scripts
>  |__ misc.

Why not use the good work of Cees, which would make integration on
Debian and RedHat (?) quite a bit easier:

  sgml
   |__ dtd
   |__ entities   # for standalone shared entities such as ISO Latin 1
   |__ stylesheet
   |__ declaration
   |__ misc   # for misc scripts and stuff

As for catalog files, I leave that up to the local maintainer.  Often
it makes sense to have them as the file 'catalog' in the same dir as
the DTDs.

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread