Subject: RE: SGML entity mgmt stds From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 15:17:25 -0400 |
Does Red Hat includes OpenJade??? regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Adam Di Carlo Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 1:57 PM To: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: SGML entity mgmt stds "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > so the following hierarchy is OK for me: > SGML > |__ DTD > |__ entity > |__ scripts > |__ misc. Why not use the good work of Cees, which would make integration on Debian and RedHat (?) quite a bit easier: sgml |__ dtd |__ entities # for standalone shared entities such as ISO Latin 1 |__ stylesheet |__ declaration |__ misc # for misc scripts and stuff As for catalog files, I leave that up to the local maintainer. Often it makes sense to have them as the file 'catalog' in the same dir as the DTDs. -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML entity mgmt stds, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | Re: SGML entity mgmt stds, Adam Di Carlo |
Re: SGML entity mgmt stds (was Re: , Adam Di Carlo | Date | RE: XSL FOs and DSSSL FOs -- same o, Didier PH Martin |
Month |