RE: SGML entity mgmt stds

Subject: RE: SGML entity mgmt stds
From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 15:17:25 -0400
Does Red Hat includes OpenJade???

regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netfolder.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Adam Di Carlo
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 1:57 PM
To: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SGML entity mgmt stds


"Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> so the following hierarchy is OK for me:
> SGML
>  |__ DTD
>  |__ entity
>  |__ scripts
>  |__ misc.

Why not use the good work of Cees, which would make integration on
Debian and RedHat (?) quite a bit easier:

  sgml
   |__ dtd
   |__ entities   # for standalone shared entities such as ISO Latin 1
   |__ stylesheet
   |__ declaration
   |__ misc   # for misc scripts and stuff

As for catalog files, I leave that up to the local maintainer.  Often
it makes sense to have them as the file 'catalog' in the same dir as
the DTDs.

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread