Subject: RE: html to dsssl ? From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:21:04 +0100 (BST) |
Didier PH Martin writes: > that XSL is intended for XML documents not for SGML documents (off course > some may say that it is possible that a XSL processor could do SGML > processing - Off course everything is possible under this sun :-) > nonetheless, it is not very probable that a XSL processor would parse SGML > documents). Surely the existing XSL processors separate out the parser engine, and do not care what it is so long as it delivers a document tree? the XSL parser and applicator itself, of course, will remain untouched. I really don't think its that unlikely that someone would fit an SGML parser to an XSL engine during the course of the next year Actually, I suspect that what we'll see is people who need to stay in SGML archivally and for special applications will add an SGML->XML process in their filter chain, and start to use XML tools.... Sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: html to dsssl ?, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: html to dsssl ?, Didier PH Martin |
Re: OpenJade News - July 8 1999, J-P Theberge | Date | RE: OpenJade News - July 8 1999, Didier PH Martin |
Month |