Subject: Re: About Constructions rules From: Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 11:10:56 +0200 |
> > [transformation language] > > > So, OpenJade architects, what do you think of trying this? Can you > > > see a place for it in OpenJade? > > > > Yes, definitively, but maybe as a separate program built upon the same > > libs (libsp, libgrove, libspgrove). > > > > It would be useful to have it in the same program, so you can run a single > job composed of multiple transformations and a single formatting on a source > document, without the overhead of writing the sgml and parsing it: > Yes it would be useful, but also more complicated and error-prone. If we break jade into components, we could have an external grove manager, and could have the transformation engine talk to the grove manager to create a grove which could then be reused by the style engine without the intermediate step of writing the grove out to an sgml file. > jade -t postscript -d indexer.dtl -d whatever.dtl -d remove.secret.stuff.dtl > -d convert.to.docbook.dtl -d style.dsl source.sgml > (Doesn't the dsssl architecture support this in style-sheets?) Yes. -- Matthias Clasen, Tel. 0761/203-5606 Email: clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mathematisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About Constructions rules, Avi Kivity | Thread | Did I goof, once again ?, Jany Quintard |
RE: About Constructions rules, Avi Kivity | Date | Re: processing character entities, David Carlisle |
Month |