Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C++ portabilit y problems From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 18 Aug 1999 12:00:29 -0400 |
Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > All my attempts to use -frepo have failed so far. Either I get undefined > symbol errors when linking the final apps or duplicate definition errors > when linking the libs. > > The gcc manual even contains the following: > > Be warned, > however, that this may cause conflicts if multiple libraries try > to provide the same instantiations. For greater control, use > explicit instantiation as described in the next option. > > Thus I guess we're better off to stay with (suitably hacked) _inst files. Ugh. Ok. Note that my changes aren't really suitable, i.e., thing will break again with g++ 2.96 and 3.0 etc. I think we wanna change the test to check for either gcc >= 2.95 or else base it on GNUlibc version?? -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Matthias Clasen | Thread | Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Matthias Clasen |
Jade validation options, Paul_Tihansky | Date | Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Matthias Clasen |
Month |