Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C++ portabilit y problems From: Peter Nilsson <pnidv96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:19:57 +0200 (CEST) |
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Avi Kivity wrote: > I'm no gcc expert, but looking at the docs I see a -frepo flag which seems > to allow you to get rid of the _inst files completely. Surely that would be > better? Or is there a catch? > Shouldn't be needed if you include the definitions in every translation unit. Regards, /Peter Nilsson -- '(?P . (?e . (?t . (?e . (?r))))) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | RE: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Avi Kivity |
RE: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Avi Kivity | Date | text output from Word, DPawson |
Month |