Subject: Re: passthrough and empty elements. From: Peter Nilsson <pnidv96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:43:22 +0100 (CET) |
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Holger Klawitter wrote: > > must-omit-end-tag? > > Shouldn't it be named "does-omit-end-tag?" then? > Probably not. quoting the SGML Property Set (sect. 9.6 in the DSSSL spec): <propdef derived rcsnm=momitend appnm="must omit end tag" datatype=boolean cn=element clause="b2209"> <desc> True if and only if the end tag for the element had to be omitted because the element had a declared content of empty or an explicit content reference. There is a browsable HTML version of the property set somewhere at http://www.hytime.org/ (I think). I don't have the exact location at hand. Best Regards, /Peter Nilsson -- '(#\P . (#\e . (#\t . (#\e . (#\r))))) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: passthrough and empty elements., Holger Klawitter | Thread | Browsable HTML of SGML property set, Toby Speight |
following white space, Peter Bennett | Date | Re: line-field usage, Peter Nilsson |
Month |