Subject: Re: support for 'macro' formatting languages From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 15 Dec 1999 17:29:24 +0000 |
Mark> Mark Wroth <URL:mailto:MARK.WROTH@xxxxxxxxxxx> 0> In article 0> <5C5DDF084661D311BDDB0008C7A4B13CC1FCD5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark 0> wrote: [regarding SGML->LaTeX transformation] Mark> I hate to disagree on philosophy questions, but I think this Mark> need is reasonably in keeping with the transformation language Mark> part of DSSSL. The only place it is at odds is that the output Mark> markup is not SGML, which the transformation language seems not Mark> to have envisioned. Can't DSSSL-T target anything with a grove representation? -- DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: support for 'macro' formatting , Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: support for 'macro' formatting , Pieter Rijken |
RE: support for 'macro' formatting , Pieter Rijken | Date | RE: support for 'macro' formatting , Norman Gray |
Month |