Re: support for 'macro' formatting languages

Subject: Re: support for 'macro' formatting languages
From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Dec 1999 17:29:24 +0000
Mark> Mark Wroth <URL:mailto:MARK.WROTH@xxxxxxxxxxx>

0> In article
0> <5C5DDF084661D311BDDB0008C7A4B13CC1FCD5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark
0> wrote:

[regarding SGML->LaTeX transformation]

Mark> I hate to disagree on philosophy questions, but I think this
Mark> need is reasonably in keeping with the transformation language
Mark> part of DSSSL.  The only place it is at odds is that the output
Mark> markup is not SGML, which the transformation language seems not
Mark> to have envisioned.

Can't DSSSL-T target anything with a grove representation?


 DSSSList info and archive:

Current Thread