Re: document-type (Was: Entities in SGML to SGML)

Subject: Re: document-type (Was: Entities in SGML to SGML)
From: Peter Nilsson <pnidv96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 12:25:24 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Jany Quintard wrote:

> elegant manner, or if document-type could be modified to allow the inclusion
> of such declarations, since it is a Jade/OpenJade extension.
> What are your opinions about it ?
> 
Ofcourse it can be changed to a non-atomic FO (without breaking backward
compability). This is now on the developers' TODO list.

Regards,
/Peter Nilsson
--
'(#\P . (#\e . (#\t . (#\e . (#\r)))))


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread