Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL

Subject: Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL
From: Trent Shipley <tcshipley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:22:03 -0700
Per request the OJ2 "minutes", part 1 & 2 were forwarded to 

An amendment to part 2 and part 3 on engineering issues has been sent 
directly to openjade-users.  Interested parties should check openjade-users 
or the relvant mail list archive on

On Wednesday 09 January 2002 14:44, Mulberry Technologies List Owner wrote:
> From: "Paul Tyson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: <dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL
> >Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:14:29 -0800
> >
> >Trent, thanks for your initiative in summarizing the recent discussion.  I
> >think it could form the basis of a white paper to be posted on the
> > openjade site at sourceforge.
> >
> >I don't know how many of the openjade developers subscribe to
> >dssslist--probably all of them.  But I suggest we try to keep OJ2
> >development discussions on the openjade-devel list.  There's not always a
> >clear dividing line, but when it gets down to specific decisions and tasks
> >for OJ2, I think those should go in the openjade-devel list.
> >
> >Trent, would you consider reposting your development-specific notes on the
> >openjade-devel list so we can pursue discussion there?
> >
> >--Paul
> >
> >Paul Tyson, Principal Consultant                   Precision Documents
> >paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    
> >     "The art and science of document engineering."
> >
> >----- Original Message -----

 DSSSList info and archive:

Current Thread