Subject: Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL From: Trent Shipley <tcshipley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:22:03 -0700 |
Per request the OJ2 "minutes", part 1 & 2 were forwarded to mailto:openjade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx An amendment to part 2 and part 3 on engineering issues has been sent directly to openjade-users. Interested parties should check openjade-users or the relvant mail list archive on SourceForge.net On Wednesday 09 January 2002 14:44, Mulberry Technologies List Owner wrote: > From: "Paul Tyson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >To: <dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL > >Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:14:29 -0800 > > > >Trent, thanks for your initiative in summarizing the recent discussion. I > >think it could form the basis of a white paper to be posted on the > > openjade site at sourceforge. > > > >I don't know how many of the openjade developers subscribe to > >dssslist--probably all of them. But I suggest we try to keep OJ2 > >development discussions on the openjade-devel list. There's not always a > >clear dividing line, but when it gets down to specific decisions and tasks > >for OJ2, I think those should go in the openjade-devel list. > > > >Trent, would you consider reposting your development-specific notes on the > >openjade-devel list so we can pursue discussion there? > > > >--Paul > > > >Paul Tyson, Principal Consultant Precision Documents > >paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://precisiondocuments.com > > "The art and science of document engineering." > > > >----- Original Message ----- DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL, Mulberry Technologie | Thread | ANN: RefDB 0.8.2 (was: Re: (dsssl) , Markus Hoenicka |
ANN: RefDB 0.8.2 (was: Re: (dsssl) , Markus Hoenicka | Date | (dsssl) <funcsynopsis> rework -- te, Curtis Michael Brune |
Month |