Subject: (dsssl) <funcsynopsis> rework -- tex From: Curtis Michael Brune <curt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 20:29:52 -0800 |
I spent some time reworking the output of <funcsynopsis> (useful if you are writing documentation for C language prototypes) for the TEX(pdf) backend -- the original definitions are found in .../print/dbsynop.dsl in Norman Walsh's stylesheets. I just wasn't happy with the default.... My hack uses (make table) so long function signatures come out looking OK. I would also like some feedback on my dsssl coding style as this is one of my first major attempts to whack on the dsssl -- do better ways exist for what I've done, could it be more portable, etc ? First the results can be seen here: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~curt/test.pdf The input xml source is here: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~curt/test.xml My DSSSL changes are here: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~curt/funcsyn.dsl I would like some comments on the style, effeciency, "functions I could have used but didn't know about..." It's a bit long, but bear with me because it works :) Cheers, Curt -- Curt Brune Stanford Linear Accelerator Center GLAST -- Flight Software Group http://www.slac.stanford.edu/exp/glast/daq curt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx =============DSSSL CODE============================ DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
ANN: RefDB 0.8.2 (was: Re: (dsssl) , Markus Hoenicka | Thread | Re: (dsssl) <funcsynopsis> rework -, Hartmut Holzgraefe |
Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL, Trent Shipley | Date | Re: (dsssl) <funcsynopsis> rework -, Hartmut Holzgraefe |
Month |