[jats-list] @content-type on elements for bibliographic citations?
Subject: [jats-list] @content-type on elements for bibliographic citations?
From: Kevin Hawkins <kevin.s.hawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:12:38 -0400
|
As I become familiar with JATS, one thing that has struck me is that the
content model of <element-citation> is remarkably flat. There is no
grouping of information within the citation -- for example, of data
relating to an article versus information related to the journal it
appears in, or of data related to a chapter versus information related
to the book it appears in, or of data related to a series in which a
book or journal issue appears.
Would anyone be willing to share a tagged examples of one or more of these:
a) A citation to a particular page or pages within a journal article
(where you an <fpage>/<lpage> pair for the cited pages and another pair
for the page range of the whole journal article)
b) A citation for a chapter within an anthology (where you one
<person-group>/<collab> for the author and one <person-group>/<collab>
for the editor of the anthology)
c) A citation for a special issue of a journal that is part of a
monographic series (where you have a <volume> for the journal's
numbering and another <volume> for the series numbering)
While I realize that in each case you could simply have more than one of
the elements I list above within the <element-citation> (or
<mixed-citation>), I'm wondering whether anyone tries to distinguish
these with, say, @content-type, and if so, whether they have a
controlled vocabulary for values of @content-type. That is, how do you
distinguish the components of such complex citations in a way that the
citation could be processed by a machine?
Thanks,
Kevin