Subject: RE: [jats-list] Ambiguity in <uri> definition From: Caroline Webber <cwebber@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:26:31 -0400 |
Hi All, What is the tentative date for JATS 1.1 to be officially released (that is, out of "draft" mode)? Caroline S. Webber Sr. Bus. Systems Analyst Aries Systems Corporation 200 Sutton Street North Andover, MA 01845 USA Tel: 978-291-1941 fax: 978-975-3811 e-mail: cwebber@xxxxxxxxxxxx Web: www.editorialmanager.com www.ariessys.com For the latest EM, PM, and industry news, subscribe to our e-newsletter and view archived issues here! This message is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message in error, do not open any attachment but please notify the sender (above) and delete this message from your system. -----Original Message----- From: Debbie Lapeyre [mailto:dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 11:43 AM To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [jats-list] Ambiguity in <uri> definition On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The definition for <uri> in "Article Authoring Tag Library NISO JATS > Draft Version 1.1d1" is: > > Identifies a Uniform Resource Identifier (such as a URL) that may be > used as a live link, typically naming a website, such as: > <uri>http://www.mulberrytech.com</uri>). > > "may be used as a live link", to my mind, implies that the example > "<uri>http://www.mulberrytech.com</uri>" is sufficient to make a 'live > link' in a styled output, but making it live requires uri/@xlink:href > as well. Sorry. That is NOT what we meant, although it may be implied. What we intended to do is make the distinction between - <ext-link> (guaranteed to be intended to be a live link) and - <uri> (which is just something that LOOKS looks like a URL or something similar, no linking is implied, but it MAY be made into a link if if you choose) As you and I discussed offline, the 'mayness' and how to get from 'may' to 'is' is never stated explicitly in the element's documentation. We had not intended to be talking about the attributes at all, but I think I agree that doing so might clarify this situation. We will try to clarify. > That <uri> "may or may not be a traversable link" is discussed under > "Related Elements" without saying what makes a <uri> into a > traversable link, and none of the three examples show a uri/@xlink:href. We are in the middle of adding a lot more examples to the JATS Tag Libraries. Some examples here would be a very good idea. Plea: if anyone has examples of - an external link using <ext-link> and - a <uri> as an external link using @xlink:href it would be greatly appreciated if you can share them with this list and thus the JATS Standing Committee. Just post a snippet (as Bruce Rosenblum did this week). Thanks --Debbie Lapeyre ================================================================ Deborah A Lapeyre mailto:dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301-315-9631 (USA) Suite 207 Fax: 301-315-8385 Rockville, MD 20850 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: Consultancy for XML, XSLT, and Schematron ================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] Ambiguity in <uri> , Debbie Lapeyre | Thread | Re: [jats-list] Ambiguity in <uri> , Tommie Usdin |
Re: [jats-list] Ambiguity in <uri> , Debbie Lapeyre | Date | Re: [jats-list] Ambiguity in <uri> , Tommie Usdin |
Month |