Subject: Re: [jats-list] <permissions> versus <attrib> when reproducing previously published material From: "Randall, Laura (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E] laura.randall@xxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:03:23 -0000 |
Hi, Rhiannon. I think that noting something has been reproduced (<attrib>) is distinctly different from documenting that an object has a different copyright (<permissions>) than the rest of the article. As I understand it, these are two different kinds of statements and belong in two different elements. The two statements are often combinedbor at least adjacentbin the presentation, but that doesnbt mean theybre the same thing or that they should be tagged as a single statement. The part of the statement that documents an object is reproduced from another source belongs in <attrib>. The copyright notice that applies to the reproduced object belongs in <permissions>. I donbt see this as contrary to the JATS4R recommendations, because that recommendation applies only to copyright, not to attribution notices. Best, Laura _______________________ Laura Randall laura.randall@xxxxxxx NCBI/NLM/NIH From: Rhiannon Miller rhiannon.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 9:03 AM To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jats-list] <permissions> versus <attrib> when reproducing previously published material I have a query regarding the use of <permissions> and <attrib> when reproducing previously published material. JATS 1.2 has updated and expanded documentation on when the <permissions> element should be used (https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/1.2/element/permissions.html ). This is as a result of a request that I made to the JATS committee asking for multiple <permissions> elements in <sec-meta>, to better record the permissions of sections where part of the material is derived (but not explicitly quoted) from a previously published article that has a different copyright. This request resulted in the new documentation, which states that <attrib>, not <permissions>, should be used for information reproduced from another source. I'm now not quite sure how to tag reproduced items at all. If <permissions> is not to be used for document objects which have been reproduced from elsewhere and therefore have different copyright licences, then what should it be used for? More importantly, if I am using <attrib> rather than <permissions> to tag a document object reproduced from elsewhere, how do I denote that this object, unlike the rest of the article, is not permitted to be reproduced? The <attrib> element doesn't seem to capture this information. For example, the article may be published under a CC-BY licence, but one section may contain parts reproduced with permission from a previously published article which has an "All rights reserved' copyright statement and therefore should not be reproduced further. Finally, this documentation doesn't seem to mesh with the JATS4R guidelines (https://jats4r.org/permissions), which say 'If any object within the article (for example, a figure or a table) has different permissions from the article as a whole, <permissions> must be included in that element to ensure the object does not inherit the permissions that apply to the document as a whole.' Any help breaking through the confusion would be much appreciated! Thanks and best wishes Rhiannon Prepress Projects Rhiannon Miller b" Project Leader +44 (0)1738 450489 JATS-List info and archive<http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/> EasyUnsubscribe<http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/247966> (by email<>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[jats-list] <permissions> versus <a, Rhiannon Miller rhia | Thread | Re: [jats-list] <permissions> versu, Rhiannon Miller rhia |
[jats-list] <permissions> versus <a, Rhiannon Miller rhia | Date | Re: [jats-list] <permissions> versu, Rhiannon Miller rhia |
Month |