Re: [jats-list] How to tag information on review process

["Armin Günther ague@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Melissa,

Thank you for your helpful answer (and sorry for the late reply)!

Yes, I saw the JATS4R recommendation on peer review materials but I
overlooked that there is also a "Parent article document" section, which is
what I am dealing with. The recommendations there strongly built on the
custom-meta element. This element is an option of course but it obviously
lacks semantic determination - or better, its meaning is to be a container
for every "custom" meaning. So I guess that there are currently no JATS
elements which are more genuinely related to characteristics of the
review/quality control process? (As peer-review is such an important aspect
of scholarly articles this might be a possible candidate for future
versions of JATS.)

Thanks again!

Best wishes

Armin


Armin GC<nther, Prof. Dr.
PsychOpen, Managing Editor

www.leibniz-psychology.org
ZPID - Leibniz-Institut fC<r Psychologie
ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology
UniversitC$tsring 15
D-54296 Trier - Germany
Tel.: +49b651b201-2055
www.psychopen.eu


Am Di., 4. Mai 2021 um 18:32 Uhr schrieb Melissa Harrison
m.harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Dear Armin
>
> Have you seen the JATS4R recommendation
> <https://jats4r.org/peer-review-materials> on peer review materials?
> It would be great if you could take a look at that and if you have any
> comments on the recommendation where you feel it could be improved or does
> not quite meet your needs please do feed them back.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Melissa
>
>
> Melissa Harrison
> Head of Production Operations
>
> Tel: +44 1223 855340
>
> http://elifesciences.org
>
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:13 PM Armin GC<nther ague@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
> jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Is there a recommended way of tagging information on the review process?
>> I need to tag the *number of review rounds* (other review related
>> information might be type of review, number of reviewers etc.). What's
>> about <event> (but this would need <pub-history> while we currently use
>> <history>)? Or would you use <count> for something like the number of
>> review rounds?
>>
>> I am grateful for any suggestion!
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Armin
>>
>>
>>
>> Armin GC<nther, Prof. Dr.
>> PsychOpen, Managing Editor
>>
>> www.leibniz-psychology.org
>> ZPID - Leibniz-Institut fC<r Psychologie
>> ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology
>> UniversitC$tsring 15
>> D-54296 Trier - Germany
>> Tel.: +49b651b201-2055
>> www.psychopen.eu
>> JATS-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/>
>> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/1483441>
(by
>> email)
>>
>
>
>
> elifesciences.org
>
> eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd is a limited liability non-profit
> non-stock corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware, USA, with
> company number 5030732, and is registered in the UK with company number
> FC030576 and branch number BR015634 at the address Westbrook Centre, Milton
> Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG.
> JATS-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/>
> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/163663> (by
> email <>)