|
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jats-list] Lists with a single item are valid, will they always be? From: "Wendell Piez wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:28:14 -0000 |
Ken, Currently, the model for list requires one or more list-item elements. It is the documentation that says two or more. The docs don't make that kind of mistake when discussing, say, <p> (<soCalled>Paragraph</soCalled>). :-) But it's "just" an editorial problem, and doesn't seem to be stopping anyone. :-) Cheers, Wendell On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 9:12b/PM G. Ken Holman g.ken.holman@xxxxxxxxx < jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 17/12/2025 14:05 +0000, Randall, Laura (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E] > laura.randall@xxxxxxx wrote: > >IF it was to ever happen, it would have to be (as Pieter said) in a > non-backward-compatible release. > >... > >From: Pieter Lamers pieter.lamers@xxxxxxxxxxxx < > jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2025 7:51 AM > >I don't think anyone is going to forbid this, as it would be a major > breaking change. I guess the standard case of a list is to contain multiple > items. > > I am unclear how changing a list from two-or-more items to one-or-more > items is a breaking change from a data perspective. > > If the edict comes down, any existing list of two-or-more items satisfies > the new specification of one-or-more items. > > Or do you mean breaking from an application's perspective of expecting two > or more and being presented with only one and not being able to handle such? > > Is backwards compatibility in JATS measured by the applications, by the > data, or by both? > > In our Universal Business Language (UBL) modeling, we've only been > measuring backward compatibility of the data and not of the applications. > For example, every theoretical valid instance of, say, UBL 2.3, is > guaranteed to be a valid instance of UBL 2.4 and all subsequent releases of > new schemas in the 2.x branch. We say nothing of the applications that > process UBL. > > . . . . . . Ken > > > -- > Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/j/ | > Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources | > Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$50 (5 hours free!) | > Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman | > > > -- ...Wendell Piez... ...wendellpiez.com... ...pellucidliterature.org... ...pausepress.org... ...github.com/wendellpiez. ..
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [EXTERNAL] [jats-list] Lists wi, Wendell Piez wapiez@ | Thread | Re: [jats-list] Lists with a single, Liam R. E. Quin liam |
| Re: [EXTERNAL] [jats-list] Lists wi, G. Ken Holman g.ken. | Date | Re: [EXTERNAL] [jats-list] Lists wi, Wendell Piez wapiez@ |
| Month |