Subject: [niso-sts] Use of TBX vs <term-display> ISO(1.1)/NISO(1.0) From: "Petra Uitermark petra.uitermark@xxxxxx" <niso-sts-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:28:46 -0000 |
Hello everyone This is the first time I'm posting in this list, so I hope this is OK. We are considering using the NISO schema for our content. In the ISO schema we are currently using the TBX Term Base to label terms in the standard. As the use of <term-display> in NISO would allow for a display in our editorial system in the sequence in which the term content appears in the standard, (the term first and then the descriptive text), we are considering using this in stead of TBX Term Base. However I'm a little bit puzzled by the implications of the documentations of NISO: "NISO STS loosened and simplified the content of the <term-display> element (making a large undifferentiated OR group) and added additional semantic tags, to make tagging existing terms and definitions easier than using the more strictly structured TBX tagging, while being backward compatible with ISOSTS V1.1" (Differences Between ISO STS 1.1 and NISO STS 1.0 - October 2017 Page 5) How is the backward compatibility to ISO sts be secured when TBX is more strict than <term-display>? Is anyone else considering this change? What should we be aware of when pursuing the backward compatibility with the more strict ISO sts? Thanks in advance for your reply. Kind regards, Petra Uitermark Online product specialist Vlinderweg 6 2623 AX Delft The Netherlands +31 6 40 165 050
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[niso-sts] NISO STS List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin btusdin | Thread | Re: [niso-sts] Use of TBX vs <term-, Tommie Usdin btusdin |
[niso-sts] NISO STS List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin btusdin | Date | Re: [niso-sts] Use of TBX vs <term-, Tommie Usdin btusdin |
Month |