Subject: [niso-sts] Encoding Bibliography From: "Dorothée Stadler doro@xxxxxxxxxxx" <niso-sts-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:34:06 -0000 |
Hello everyone, I have a question about how to best encode the Bibliography as part of the back matter. To me, the most logical thing to do is use <sec> with @sec-type=bbiblb. Now I see in the NISO documentation of <sec> that it should be used as follows: Within the back matter (<back> <https://www.niso-sts.org/TagLibrary/niso-sts-TL-1-0-html/element/back.html>) to tag material that has not been explicitly named as one of the other back matter components, that is, it is not named as an annex (<app> <https://www.niso-sts.org/TagLibrary/niso-sts-TL-1-0-html/element/app.html>), an acknowledgment (<ack> <https://www.niso-sts.org/TagLibrary/niso-sts-TL-1-0-html/element/ack.html>), a bibliography (<ref-list> <https://www.niso-sts.org/TagLibrary/niso-sts-TL-1-0-html/element/ref-list.ht ml>), etc. I am now confused. Should the bibliography always be encoded using <ref-list>, as it is also currently done by ISO using the ISOSTS? If so, why do we even have an @sec-type=bbiblb? Any enlightenment would be much appreciated! Kind regards DorothC)e --------------------------------------------- DorothC)e Stadler Rathenower Str. 38 10559 Berlin Tel: +49 1525 840 85 93 doro@xxxxxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [niso-sts] Use of TBX vs <term-, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Thread | Re: [niso-sts] Encoding Bibliograph, Tommie Usdin btusdin |
Re: [niso-sts] Use of TBX vs <term-, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | Re: [niso-sts] Encoding Bibliograph, Tommie Usdin btusdin |
Month |