|
Subject: Pattern and Action Containers (was: XSL Discussion) From: David Megginson <ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 06:29:09 -0500 |
Jeremie Miller writes:
> First off, I've mentioned in the past that I think a simple separation of
> the patterns and actions should happen, like:
> <rule>
> <pattern>
> <target-element type="p">
> </pattern>
> <action>
> <DIV>
> <children/>
> </DIV>
> </action>
> </rule>
> Much of what I'm going to be talking about is based on this...
Absolutely correct -- it is a basic principle of good document type
design that a series of related elements should appear within a
container. There are two advantages to doing so:
1) Software will know when the series is finished without reading ahead one
element.
2) Authors can easily cut-and-paste the whole series into a different
location.
What is the thinking of the XSL WG on this point?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| XSL Discussion, Jeremie Miller | Thread | RE: XSL Discussion, James K. Tauber |
| XSL Discussion, Jeremie Miller | Date | Re: Pattern and Action Containers (, Sean Mc Grath |
| Month |