Subject: RE: XSL Discussion From: David Schach <davidsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 08:53:37 -0800 |
> First off, I've mentioned in the past that I think a simple separation of > the patterns and actions should happen, like: > <rule> > <pattern> > <target-element type="p"> > </pattern> > <action> > <DIV> > <children/> > </DIV> > </action> > </rule> > I agree. This makes it a lot easier to read the rules. The downside is that it makes XSL even more verbose than it already is. > Much of what I'm going to be talking about is based on this... > > Lets talk about the patterns for a bit. Maybe it's just a matter of > syntax, > but I would feel more comfortable writing something like: > <chapter> > <p type="introduction" xml:style="target"/> > </chapter> > This was considered and there are still supporters for this syntax. The argument against it is that it makes it impossible to write a DTD for XSL. In addition, the <chapter> and <p> are really being used out of context in the XSL document. > . > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL Discussion, James K. Tauber | Thread | RE: XSL Discussion, David Megginson |
RE: XSL Discussion, James K. Tauber | Date | RE: XSL Discussion, David Megginson |
Month |