Subject: Re: More XSL Discussion From: Norman Walsh <norm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:19:13 -0500 |
| Okay! I'm half way there. An XSL processor is free | to create the flow objects in any order it likes cos the place they | are going in the resultant tree does not depend on creation order. | Fine. The part I still don't get is how the rule might be | triggered 1000 times? In practice, it probably won't, but there's nothing about building a tree that says I can't construct a given node 1000 times and throw the first 999 away. What this amounts to is that there is no guarantee that a given construction rule will only fire once for a given element. And an implementation that does occasionally build a node that it discards can still be viewed as "doing the right thing." Cheers, norm -- Norman Walsh <nwalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | Any sufficiently undocumented Senior Application Analyst | code is indistinguishable from ArborText, Inc. (www.arbortext.com) | magic. 413.549.3868 Voice/FAX | XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: More XSL Discussion, Sean Mc Grath | Thread | Re: More XSL Discussion, Chris Maden |
Re: More XSL Discussion, Sean Mc Grath | Date | Re: More XSL Discussion, Chris Maden |
Month |