Re: Interactive XML

Subject: Re: Interactive XML
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 12:18:50 -0500
Pawson, David wrote:
> > Picking up on one point in this thread,
> are you guys happy having ecmascript as the available tool
> for basic processing?
> It is dismally inadequate for our needs here, has no one else
> picked up on this? Any sort of forms processing will surely need
> more than ecmascript?

Why? Thousands of sites use ECMAScript for forms processing today. Before
there was a web, forms processing was mostly done in variants of basic
like Visual Basic and PowerScript. If Basic was powerful enough, why
wouldn't ECMAScript be?

 Paul Prescod  -

Three things trust above all else: Your knowledge of your craft
That someone turns a profit, and that you will get the shaft

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread