Subject: Re: Interactive XML From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 16:41:45 +0100 |
Paul Prescod writes: > same standard library. Typically the ECMAScript version will be more > readable to the typical programmer because it uses a more conventional > syntax and less constrained ("side-effect-free") data model. "typical", "conventional"? is the next century to remain dominated by those who learnt their computing in the 1970s? sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Interactive XML, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Interactive XML, Paul Prescod |
Re: Interactive XML, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: Interactive XML, Paul Prescod |
Month |