Re: Interactive XML

[Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul Prescod writes:
 > same standard library. Typically the ECMAScript version will be more
 > readable to the typical programmer because it uses a more conventional
 > syntax and less constrained ("side-effect-free") data model.

"typical", "conventional"? is the next century to remain dominated by
those who learnt their computing in the 1970s? 

sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list