Re: Interactive XML

Subject: Re: Interactive XML
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 16:41:45 +0100
Paul Prescod writes:
 > same standard library. Typically the ECMAScript version will be more
 > readable to the typical programmer because it uses a more conventional
 > syntax and less constrained ("side-effect-free") data model.

"typical", "conventional"? is the next century to remain dominated by
those who learnt their computing in the 1970s? 


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread