Subject: Re: How to do XML to XML translation From: Stefan Trcek <stefan_trcek@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 11:08:27 +0200 |
Excuse, if you get this mail twice, I didn't get it from the list since yesterday, so I guess it had been lost somewhere. Thanks for that many suggestions. Just a note, why I tried this way: - I like better being declarative than writing programs. Declarative is better maintainable, at least for me. If necessary I "perl" it out to Java or C. - XSL pattern are sufficient for me to process the source. - XSL spec is 24 pages only, KISS :-) - source, destination and transformation in XML sounds uniform to me. For me it would be sufficient to have a XML source language, a XML destination language (my own, of course) and a (maybe XSL-like) spec to convert from src to dest. This would make HTML and DSSSL flow objects a just special destination. Is there any reason that makes people concentrate on text processing? I think there are a lot of other usefull XML applications (and that's more interesting for me), such as - Get objects from a database and make an XML document of it. - Delete parts, for which the user has no privileges (XML to itself). - assume: vendor for database A ex/im-ports in XML, vendor for database B in different XML. Make them interoperate (XML to XML). -- Stefan Trcek XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Kai Grossjohann | Thread | Defining widget flow objects (was R, Bill Lindsey |
Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Brandon Ibach | Date | Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Bill Lindsey |
Month |