Subject: Re: Language choice (was: Re: Interactive XML) From: "Bill Lindsey" <blindsey@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 10:42:41 +0000 |
I've looked, but I can't find it. Shouldn't there be something in the requirements draft that I could point to and say "Aha, this is why XML + Javascript (er, ECMAScript) syntax is a better choice than Scheme syntax"? In my opinion, if the choice is to be considered justified, the basis ought to be more explicit. Cheers, Bill XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Paul Prescod |
Re: How to do XML to XML translatio, Stefan Trcek | Date | Defining widget flow objects (was R, Bill Lindsey |
Month |