Subject: Re: Interactive XML From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 20:51:08 |
At 00:15 01/07/98 +0200, Chris Lilley wrote: >Thats an interesting use of the word portable. > >Even if the languages are extended to two - ECMAScript and Java 1.2, say >- that doubles the implementation load for anyone writing a conformant >implementation. Or alternatively, it requires softening the conformance I use java because it is platform-independent (and can be run with or without a browser). Is ECMAScript available in standalone form (i.e. without a browser)? If so, I may come to learn to love it - if not, it makes standalone XSL impossible which is a serious drawback. P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Interactive XML, Chris Lilley | Thread | Re: Interactive XML, Chris Lilley |
Re: Interactive XML, Kent Fitch | Date | XSL and IE5, Martin Bryan |
Month |