Subject: Re: Interactive XML From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 01:15:59 +0200 |
Peter Murray-Rust wrote: > Is ECMAScript available in standalone form (i.e. > without a browser)? If so, I may come to learn to love it - if not, it > makes standalone XSL impossible which is a serious drawback. Fair point. Check out for example http://home.worldcom.ch/~jmlugrin/fesi/index.html Also, depending on the amount of ECMAScript that XSL uses for its expression language, it can be feasible to translate that int another language that a particular implementation finds to be more convenient. -- Chris XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Interactive XML, Peter Murray-Rust | Thread | Re: Interactive XML, Kai Grossjohann |
Re: Defining widget flow objects (w, Brandon Ibach | Date | Re: Interactive XML, Kent Fitch |
Month |