Subject: RE: First working draft of XSL From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 18:13:16 -0700 |
> For example, XSL patterns use > > list/item > > to express *all* items with parents of type list > > The same thing in XPointer is, I think: > > descendant(all,list).child(all,item) > > Why not use the XSL syntax for this? > > Furthermore, why not extend the XSL pattern syntax to allow for > things like > > descendant(all,list).child(3,item) > > (ie the third item in every list) > > to be expressible as the XSL pattern: > > list/item[3] > > or something similar. > > What do people think? I think you'll find that a lot of people have similar thoughts... XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: First working draft of XSL, James K. Tauber | Thread | Re: First working draft of XSL, Jeremy CALLES |
XSL implementation available, James Clark | Date | Any examples of server side XML app, Amit Rekhi |
Month |