|
Subject: how can I test current element type? From: Dave Carlson <dcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 10:34:49 -0600 |
I'd like to test the *current* element type within an <xsl:if /> statement,
but this does not seem possible in the current XSL pattern syntax. In the
following extract, I tried the statement:
<xsl:if test=".[Interface]">interface </xsl:if>
But, this is rejected by the XT processor. I intend for this to say "is the
current element of type 'Instance'?" Should this be accepted? Is there an
alternative?
<xsl:template match="Package">
<xsl:process select="ownedElement/Interface"/>
<xsl:process select="ownedElement/Class"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="Interface|Class">
<DIV style="color: black; padding: 6px; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold">
<xsl:process select="visibility"/><xsl:text> </xsl:text>
<xsl:process select="isLeaf"/><xsl:text> </xsl:text>
<xsl:process select="isAbstract"/><xsl:text> </xsl:text>
<xsl:process select="ownerScope"/><xsl:text> </xsl:text>
<xsl:if test=".[Interface]">interface </xsl:if>
<xsl:if test=".[Class]">class </xsl:if>
<xsl:process select="name"/><xsl:text> </xsl:text>
<xsl:process select="generalization"/>
</DIV>
... more stuff
</xsl:template>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| tree addressing language (was Re: N, James Tauber | Thread | FOs for Tree Control, James Tauber |
| Re: New/old pattern syntax, why can, Scott Lawton | Date | FOs for Tree Control, James Tauber |
| Month |