Subject: Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variations on the XML syntax From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 08:14:58 -0500 |
My perspective on "New users will all use a GUI" is "I'll believe it when I see it." Until then, I think that we should design under the assumption that the markup is the user interface to XSL. Designing a GUI for queries is non-trivial, which is why I still hack SQL by hand most of the time. The same will be true of complex XSL patterns. Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "You have the wrong number." "Eh? Isn't that the Odeon?" "No, this is the Great Theater of Life. Admission is free, but the taxation is mortal. You come when you can, and leave when you must. The show is continuous. Good-night." -- Robertson Davies, "The Cunning Man" XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Paul Prescod | Thread | RE: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Pawson, David |
Re: EcmaScript, gone?, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: New/old pattern syntax, why can, Dave Peterson |
Month |