Subject: RE: XSL questions From: Ed Nixon <ed.nixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 10:39:22 -0500 |
Regarding <empty/> it is certainly possible to 'ignore' elements and their children, thus deleting them out of the output document, by simply not creating a match template that looks for them. I don't know if this is in the spirit of <empty/> or not but it seems to have the desired (and sometimes undesired) effect. ...edN -----Original Message----- From: keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx [SMTP:keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 1998 9:18 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: XSL questions It might be worth drawing up a table showing examples of old syntax compared with new syntax, to help folks switch over. Unless I'm out of date, Ecmascript/Javascript support has been dropped from the current XSL working draft. I think folks have said that some kind of scripting support may come back in future versions. That knocks out the <eval/> and <define-script/> elements. I'm not sure what the current equivalent of <empty/> is... a template with no contents, perhaps? ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL questions, keshlam | Thread | XSL questions, Patrice Bonhomme |
XSL questions, keshlam | Date | whitespace handling and the XSL FO , James Tauber |
Month |