Subject: Re: XSL intent survey From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:43:18 +0000 |
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 11/20/98 10:50:45 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: xsl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: XSL intent survey I would assume that flow objects are desirable to that XSL is not dependant on HTML for the rendering of XML data. For web design this isn't a big issue, for print etc., it might be. Not being a printer, I wouldn't like to say :) Cheers Guy. [SNIP] Is a formatting language strictly necessary in addition to transformation? Can't you build the formatting into the output as part of the transformation? What can't you do if you drop the fo: (like Microsoft have temporarily done). This is not an opinion but a question - I probably don't know enough about document stylesheets to understand why you need the formatting objects and perhaps someone on the list can explain. Bill Ayers (BillA@xxxxxxxxxx) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL intent survey, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: XSL intent survey, Ed Nixon |
Re: XSL intent survey, David Carlisle | Date | Re: XSL in IE 5.0, or is it?, clilley |
Month |