Subject: Re: XSL intent survey From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:12:54 +0200 |
Ed Nixon <ed.nixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >XSL, we can only hope will be able to survive the storms and stresses of the >development process with a similar, if somewhat less comprehensive, set of >cleanly integrated but differentiated features. With all due respect for >surveys and questionnaires, it's not clear to me what the purpose or benefit >will be other than to add more complications to what must be already a highly >complicated, read: politicized, process. I'd feel much most positive about r >esponding to something even semi-official from the Working Group. It's high >time for a new draft, note, or whatever. Does this mean I can add you with a "yes" answer for question #1 - "The W3 organization should address the issue" ? :-) Oren. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL intent survey, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: XSL intent survey, Oren Ben-Kiki |
RE: XSL in IE 5.0, or is it?, Gabriel Paiz III | Date | Re: XSL intent survey, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |