Re: XSL intent survey

["Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>It is rather sad that the `suggested' answers in this survey didn't
>suggest the most obvious language on which to base this system (as it is
>in fact the language on which large parts of XSL are based) namely
>dsssl. (`base' can be taken rather loosely, for example people seem not
>to like dsssl syntax (for (some (strange (reason))))).


There are other alternative languages I didn't list - Spice, for example.
However I agree that DSSSL should have been listed. Sorry for the omission -
I don't know DSSSL that well - but people are free to specify it in their
responses, and in fact several did.

Oren.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list