Subject: Re: Stepping back, for a moment... From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 10:05:14 +0200 |
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So, to wrap up this somewhat incoherent rambling, I think some >> larger scale analysis of what we're really out to do may be in order > >which was all I really hoped to provoke with my messages, rather than >taking a vote at this stage. Especially since the constituency of such a >vote; namely the random collection of people signed up to this list >is probably not representitive of anything. So can I add another "yes" vote for question #1 (the W3 org. should address this issue?) :-) I agree that the constituency of the survey isn't ideal. But assuming we do want the w3 organization to resolve this, what's the alternative? Oren. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Stepping back, for a moment..., David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Stepping back, for a moment..., David Carlisle |
Problem with >40,000 byte digests, XSL-List Owner | Date | Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |