|
Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 17:16:27 +0000 |
Hi Simon.
No wish at all to offend, merely giving voice to a feeling, honest.
At present, I really couldn't care less about CSS. In it's right role it's
lovely, but while it may seem that CSS is getting tarred with HTMLs sins (I
certainly wouldn't do so), you might sctualy be picking up frustration from
people who see CSS as having little relevence to the present state of XSL,
and while considering XSL on the XSL-List keep on running into questions of
"why isn't XSL like CSS?".
I'm not suggesting you;re doing that, merely speculating where the
percieved tarring might originate from.
Cheers
Guy.
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/14/98 06:47:02 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject: Re: syntax feedback
[SNIP]
XSL, of course, receives this benefit as well. I just wish the XSL
cheerleaders would avoid the temptation to tar CSS with HTML's sins.
Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Cookies
Sharing Bandwidth
Building XML Applications (February)
http://www.simonstl.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: syntax feedback, Guy_Murphy | Thread | RE: syntax feedback, Lawton, Scott |
| Re: alternating tags in a list?, Chris Maden | Date | Re: alternating tags in a list?, Guy_Murphy |
| Month |