Subject: Re: XSL with scripting From: Tyler Baker <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 20:14:25 -0500 |
Flow Simulation wrote: > Now we have seen the latest XSL draft, and scripting hasn't reappeared. > > Since there are obviously strong feelings about this, for and against, > perhaps we should take a vote and send the result to the W3C as > on the transformation/formatting issue. > > I think this one would be a simple yes/no. Any takers? The question more importantly would be how you would support scripting and to what extent. I am personally against adding scripting because learning entire new programming (scripting languages) to use XSL I feel defeats its use in the first place as a simple stylsheet language. There are already lots of existing complex solutions out there that have the power you may need for your particular app so why not just use it instead of XSL. For XSL to be successful, it needs to be broadly adopted. Adding in complex hooks that everyone must support is not the way to go. If you want to layer your own scripting solution on top of XSL or else build your own proprietary version of XSL to do your own server-processing needs, then I see nothing wrong with that. Tyler XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL with scripting, Daniel GLAZMAN | Thread | Re: XSL with scripting, Ray Cromwell |
RE: The XSL-List Digest V1 #250, Biron,Paul V | Date | Re: FW: XSL with scripting, Tyler Baker |
Month |