Subject: Re: XSL with scripting From: Daniel GLAZMAN <daniel.glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 12:13:48 +0100 |
Chris Lilley answered to Paul Prescod : > > Users ceded control of their standards from organizations they could > > control -- such as the IETF and ISO -- to organizations that they could > > not -- such as the W3C. Warf ! New Years's joke ?-) > Keep telling yourself that, Paul ;-) While you are at it, go to > www-style and tell the folks there that they had no influence on CSS. > Your black-and-white arguments are a little oversimplified for my taste. I am not W3C staff and agree 1500% with Chris. Check W3C web site and find the last NOTE from Bert Bos about possible CSS extensions. Most of the content of this document comes from users' suggestions posted to www-style or ciwas newsgroup. Most of W3C WGs members also follow the comp.infosystems.* Usenet newsgroups and I have always seen interesting postings forwarded to w3c mailing lists. I have also seen temporary invitations (using Cc) for suggestions' authors to participate to the discussion. BTW, do you really think that users have control of ISO ?! I think I'll forward your opinion to our normalization group here at Electricité de France, they are going to appreciate it ;-) </Daniel> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL with scripting, Chris Lilley | Thread | Re: XSL with scripting, Tyler Baker |
Re: Another DOM and XSL incompatibi, James Clark | Date | XML + XSL => RTF? Is this possible?, anette . engel |
Month |