Subject: Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:35:36 +0000 |
Hi David. I might be missing something here myself, but as I understand it... In a transformation how would you produce CDATA in the resulting document without <xsl:cdata> ? Say the magic words <![CDATA[ ]]> and as if by magic one appears *here*, not *there*. On the other hand <xsl:cdata> produces CDATA there in the result tree, not here in the XSL document. Of course I could have all this horribly wrong, as I'm struggling to keep up :) Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 01/14/99 11:41:04 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: cdata was: XSL and HTML > <xsl:cdata> tag, there is an obvious need for this What would <xsl:cdata> mean? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML, David Carlisle |
Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: Existing XSL processors, James Tauber |
Month |