|
Subject: Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:35:36 +0000 |
Hi David.
I might be missing something here myself, but as I understand it...
In a transformation how would you produce CDATA in the resulting document
without <xsl:cdata> ? Say the magic words <![CDATA[ ]]> and as if by magic
one appears *here*, not *there*. On the other hand <xsl:cdata> produces
CDATA there in the result tree, not here in the XSL document.
Of course I could have all this horribly wrong, as I'm struggling to keep
up :)
Cheers
Guy.
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 01/14/99 11:41:04 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject: cdata was: XSL and HTML
> <xsl:cdata> tag, there is an obvious need for this
What would <xsl:cdata> mean?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML, David Carlisle |
| Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: Existing XSL processors, James Tauber |
| Month |