Subject: Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:29:26 GMT |
> practicaly a node that has it's data flagged as CDATA might > pragmatically be thought of as a CDATA node. only if the flag is saved with the node. Then it _is_ a new node type. But if it is just a switch to the parser then the information just is not there, there is no flag. > How can I get CDATA in the result tree? you say you want this: <p> <![CDATA[ TEST ]]> </p> but that isn't the result tree itself, it is just one possible concrete syntax for a p element with children consisting of the character data " TEST ". An alternative and equivalent representation of that tree is <p> TEST </p> David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: cdata was: XSL and HTML, Guy_Murphy | Thread | Apology (Was RE: Still a Newbie , S, Miles Sabin |
Pattern matching, Bovone Stefano | Date | Re: Existing XSL processors, Joel Rosi-Schwartz |
Month |