Subject: Re: last of type problem From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:32:02 +0700 |
regan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi all, > I am working on a project where we are converting XML + XSL -> HTML, > currently I am using XT (thanks!). I have come across an issue that I > initially thought would be easy: creating a comma separated list. My problem > is the items I collect for the list come from separate sections of the XML > tree, and what last-of-type() tests is whether the node has following > siblings in relation to it parent, not to the collection of nodes I have > collected. Is there any way to do this? Not in general. Things are worse when the list is a result of sorting. We know about this problem and it's on our list of issues. It needs to be possible to do processing based on the position of the node not in the source tree but in the list of nodes being processed with xsl:for-each or xsl:apply-templates. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
last of type problem, regan | Thread | Re: last of type problem, Jarle Stabell |
Re: GOTCHA!, James Clark | Date | Re: Existing XSL processors, Joel Rosi-Schwartz |
Month |