Subject: Re: xt + lotusxsl From: Nantapon Chaimunkong <b38npc@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:00:07 +0700 (GMT) |
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 Scott_Boag/CAM/Lotus@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > (1) Both xt and lotusxsl seems to implements some kind of specificity. What > > rule do they use from previous draft? Is priority attribute come first? > > No, they don't implement specificity. Document order and the priority attribute > are the tie-breaking conflict resolution mechanism for the moment. LotusXSL > warns you about any conflicts that will be resolved using document order. These > can always be 'fixed' using the priority attribute. Ah, I see. You choose the last one. Can you tell me why you(jclark or scott) choose the last one not the first one? After I implements priority, my processor also choose the last one because of the sorting algorithm. :P > I'm not sure I grocked your question correctly. The default namespace of the > stylesheet is not used in the patterns. Does this help? > Yes, a lot. Please correct me. Nantapol XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
xt + lotusxsl, Nantapol Chaimankong | Thread | Re: xt + lotusxsl, Nantapon Chaimunkong |
Re: xt + lotusxsl (fwd), Nantapon Chaimunkong | Date | Announcement, Didier PH Martin |
Month |