Re: xt + lotusxsl

Subject: Re: xt + lotusxsl
From: Nantapon Chaimunkong <b38npc@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:00:07 +0700 (GMT)

On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 Scott_Boag/CAM/Lotus@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> > (1) Both xt and lotusxsl seems to implements some kind of specificity. What
> > rule do they use from previous draft? Is priority attribute come first?
> 
> No, they don't implement specificity.  Document order and the priority attribute
> are the tie-breaking conflict resolution mechanism for the moment.  LotusXSL
> warns you about any conflicts that will be resolved using document order.  These
> can always be 'fixed' using the priority attribute.

Ah, I see. You choose the last one. Can you tell me why you(jclark or
scott) choose the last one not the first one? 

After I implements priority, my processor also choose the last one because
of the sorting algorithm. :P

> I'm not sure I grocked your question correctly.  The default namespace of the
> stylesheet is not used in the patterns.  Does this help?
> 
Yes, a lot.

Please correct me.
Nantapol


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread