Subject: Re: xt + lotusxsl From: Nantapon Chaimunkong <b38npc@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:48:25 +0700 (GMT) |
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Nantapon Chaimunkong wrote: > > Ah, I see. You choose the last one. Can you tell me why you(jclark or > scott) choose the last one not the first one? > > After I implements priority, my processor also choose the last one because > of the sorting algorithm. :P I've made mistake again. It is said in the spec that if 2 or more rules are still present after using importance and priority. The last rule will be used or the processor must signal an error. The same is true for macro as well. However the same is not true for ID. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: xt + lotusxsl, Nantapon Chaimunkong | Thread | reverse the order of sibling elemen, Richtner, Fredrik |
Announcement, Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: Observation, Guy_Murphy |
Month |