Subject: RE: XSL practice From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 14:56:09 -0500 |
Hi Lars, <YourComment> They did convert from XML to HTML, but they did not use XSL, partly since these documents are older than even the first XSL proposal. What was used was Java code built on top of Tim Brays Lark parser. That code comes with the Lark parser (the XH files and package). <Reply> Thanx for the historical explanation but this doesn't excuse the practice. This situation should be corrected and W3 show the example by providing these documents with their associated XSL style sheets. Or simply remove the link until a) W3 has the resource to do so (but as enough money to do it no?) b) W3 has the will to do it c) W3 do some quality assurance check before posting d) Just do not show it until ready e) W3 show by example. (My preferred option ;-) Regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL practice, Lars Marius Garshol | Thread | Bugs in the DTD or the XML spec doc, Didier PH Martin |
RE: About the style processing inst, Didier PH Martin | Date | Waht is the common minimum current , Didier PH Martin |
Month |