Subject: Re: Venting From: "Rick Ross" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 12:25:32 -0500 |
Peace on Earth, goodwill to men :) We're encountering a pitfall that seems more the norm than the exception on listservs - people are drawing lines in the sand rather than engaging in rich dialog and exploring an important issue about which people have well-formed and significantly differing viewpoint. I was really glad to read Guy's point of view, and I suspect that the differing positions are less mutually exclusive than they may appear at first glance. We need for a quality exposition of the meaningful points at issue to ensue, not confrontation or frustration. XSL has a very bright future - but it must thrive in a marketplace, not just in technology discussions. It is in ALL of our best interests for this conversation to lead to an outstanding result. I urge us to continue a quality discussion on the subject of separating the pieces without destroying their linkage. Let's specifically avoid a jihad! Rick Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > OK lets sacrafice XSL on the alter of marketing spin so you can describe > your product as 100% XSL compliant. > > As a developer however, excuse me if I don't like the idea. > > Cheers > Guy.
begin:vcard n:Ross;Rick tel;fax:(212) 896-8222 tel;work:(212) 896-8220 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:Activated Intelligence adr:;;100 Park Avenue;New York;NY;10017;US version:2.1 email;internet:rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx title:President note:Java Lobby - http://www.javalobby.org x-mozilla-cpt:;32416 fn:Rick Ross end:vcard
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Venting, Simon St.Laurent | Thread | MS patents style sheets, Simon St.Laurent |
Re: Venting, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: Venting, Paul Prescod |
Month |