Re: Splitting XSL

Subject: Re: Splitting XSL
From: "Rick Ross" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 07:54:35 -0500
2 comments, neither deeply significant...

1 - I really liked the idea of retaining the "binding factor" of the XSL
name, but splitting it into two specs. The idea of XSL-T and XSL-FO had a
lot of appeal from my POV, and may cause less anxiety that the integrity of
XSL is at risk.

2 - I don't exactly know who this proposal is addressed to, but it would be
worthwhile to make it shorter, if possible.


Paul Prescod wrote:
> Here is the text I propose. I look forward to comments.

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread