Subject: Re: SGML output from XSL? From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: 09 Feb 1999 17:51:48 +0100 |
* Paul Prescod | | The XSL specification does not formally define an output | language. It defines a concept called a "result tree." That result | tree has no serialization syntax. XML is an obvious syntax for | engines that want to serialize the output tree, but that doesn't | mean that an XSL implementation needs to output that tree in XML or | any other syntax. * Chris Lilley | | Hmm ... in that case, it needs to be clarified that XML is the | serialisation syntax. I don't think that's a good idea, since it limits what XSL can be used for. People have already used XSL to produce TeX and groff and I think those are worthwhile uses of XSL. --Lars M. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML output from XSL?, Chris Lilley | Thread | Re: SGML output from XSL?, Paul Prescod |
An other example of a domain langua, Didier PH Martin | Date | ?<xsl:apply-templates select="tag"/, Stephen Yearl |
Month |